Oxford is included in the M40 & M1 Corridor dataset. This local comparison page helps owners interpret that regional evidence while keeping the scoring method and source date transparent.
Oxford includes closely built terraces, period housing, flats and newer suburban property. Shared walls can make loft and structural alterations relevant to the Act, while extensions may also trigger the excavation provisions even where the proposed work does not touch the party wall itself.
The Act applies according to the proposed work and the relationship between the properties—not simply the postcode. If your property is in Jericho, Cowley, Headington, Iffley, Summertown and the wider Oxford area, the same statutory tests apply.
Important: this is not a separate Oxford-only ranking. It uses the current M40 & M1 Corridor specialist dataset. A practice’s inclusion here means it appears in that regional comparison; it does not imply that the practice is headquartered in Oxford.
View the full M40 & M1 Corridor ranking → See the scoring formula →
The table below reproduces the first five positions from the regional ranking so you can compare the evidence without leaving this page. Source data was recorded on 25 September 2026.
| Rank | Company | Reviews | Google rating | Published fees | Overall score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cubit Party Wall Surveyors | 181 | 5.0 | Published | 9.50 | |
| 2 | Coburns Party Wall | 162 | 4.8 | Published | 9.33 | |
| 3 | Hudson Party Wall Surveyors | 127 | 5.0 | Guide | 8.21 | |
| 4 | Applewoods Party Wall | 21 | 5.0 | No published fee | 4.70 | |
| 5 | BH Party Wall Surveyors | 4 | 5.0 | No published fee | 4.13 |
The full regional page contains the complete table and fee-value information. Google review counts and ratings can change after the source date.
Not necessarily. Party wall appointments are statutory dispute-resolution appointments, and many specialist practices work across a wider region. Location can matter for inspection logistics and availability, but it does not form part of this site's score. Compare who will actually handle the work, how quickly they can inspect when required, their party wall experience and their fee structure.
This site deliberately treats rating and review volume as separate factors. A very high rating based on a small number of reviews is different evidence from a similar rating supported by a much larger review history. Published fee value is assessed separately where there is enough comparable information.
A low fee is of little value if the wrong notices are served or if unnecessary work is created. The first question should be what the Act actually requires for the proposed works. For a plain-English explanation of common party wall issues, see the Party Wall Knowledge Base.
These local guides use the same regional dataset and are intended to help users navigate it by place without changing the underlying score.